Tim van Gelder Research Publications
Forthcoming2005van Gelder, T. J. (2005). Teaching critical thinking: some lessons from cognitive science. College Teaching, 45, 1-6. van Gelder, T. J. (2005). Enhancing and Augmenting Human Reasoning. In A. Zilhão (Ed.), Cognition, Evolution, and Rationality. London: Routledge. 2004van Gelder, T. (2004). Beyond the mind-body problem. In C. Erneling & D. Johnson (Eds.), The Mind as a Scientific Object: Between Brain and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press. van Gelder, T. J., Bissett, M., & Cumming, G. (2004). Cultivating Expertise in Informal Reasoning. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 142-152. 2002van Gelder, T. J. (2002). Argument Mapping with Reason!Able. The American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers, 85-90. van Gelder, T. J. (2002). Enhancing Deliberation Through Computer-Supported Argument Visualization. In P. Kirschner & S. Buckingham Shum & C. Carr (Eds.), Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making. London: Springer-Verlag. van Gelder, T.J. A ‘Reason!Able’ Approach to Critical Thinking. Principal Matters: The Journal for Australasian Secondary School Leaders, May 2002, 34-6. 2001van Gelder, T.J. (2001) How to improve critical thinking using educational technology. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught & T. Petrovic (Eds.), Meeting at the Crossroads. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. (pp. 539-548). Melbourne: Biomedical Multimedia Unit, The University of Melbourne. van Gelder, T.J. (2001) The Reason! Project. The Skeptic, 21 no.2, pp.9-12 van Gelder, T.J. Critical Thinking: Some Lessons Learned. Adult Learning Australia Adult Learning Commentary Number 12, 30 May 2001 van Gelder, T.J. & Rizzo, A. Reason!Able Across the Curriculum. in 2001: Is IT an Odyssey in Learning? Proceedings of the 2001 Conference of ICT in Education Victoria 2000van Gelder, T.J. (2000) Critical Thinking on the Web. Informal Logic, 20, Teaching Supplement #3: pp. TS 84-TS 86. pdf van Gelder, T. J. (2000) Learning to reason: A Reason!-Able approach. In C. Davis, T. J. van Gelder, & R. Wales ed., Cognitive Science in Australia, 2000: Proceedings of the Fifth Australasian Cognitive Science Society Conference. Adelaide: Causal. pdf van Gelder, T. J., & Bulka, A. (2000) Reason!: Improving informal reasoning skills. in Proceedings of the Australian Computers in Education Conference, Melbourne July 2000. pdf van Gelder, T. J. (2000) Of all the bars, in all the world... Quadrant, July-August, 35-37. Version broadcast on Ockham's Razor, ABC Radio National van Gelder, T. J. (2000) Wooden Iron? Husserlian Phenomenology Meets Cognitive Science. In J. Petitot, F. J. Varela, J.-M. Roy, & B. Pachoud ed., Naturalizing Phenomenology: Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press, van Gelder, T. J. (2000) The Efficacy of Informal Reasoning Courses. Preprint No. 1/2000, University of Melbourne Department of Philosophy. html 1999van Gelder, T., Williams, N., Di Nicolantonio, R., & Kemm, R. (1999) Critical thinking in physiology: A Reason!-able approach. In ASCILITE 1999: Responding to Diversity. Proceedings from the 16th Annual Conference of the Australiasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology, 359-367. pdf van Gelder, T. J. (1999) Bait and switch? Real time, ersatz time and dynamical models. In R. Heath, B. Hayes, A. Heathcote, & C. Hooker ed., Dynamical Cognitive Science: Proceedings of the Fourth Australasian Cognitive Science Conference. Newcastle, NSW: University of Newcastle. html van Gelder, T. J. (1999) What's philosophy got to do with it? In R. Heath, B. Hayes, A. Heathcote, & C. Hooker ed., Dynamical Cognitive Science: Proceedings of the Fourth Australasian Cognitive Science Conference. Newcastle, NSW: University of Newcastle. html van Gelder, T. J. (1999) Dynamic approaches to cognition. In R. Wilson & F. Keil ed., The MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 244-6. pdf van Gelder, T. J. (1999) Distributed versus local representation. In R. Wilson & F. Keil ed., The MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 236-8. pdf van Gelder, T. (1999) Revisiting the Dynamical Hypothesis. Preprint No. 2/99, University of Melbourne, Department of Philosophy. pdf van Gelder, T. (1999) "Heads I Win, Tails You Lose": A Brief Foray into the Psychology of Philosophy. In D. Gaffy & E. Schabel ed., Proceedings of the Philosophy Women's Committee Lunchtime Series, Vol. 1. 92-103. van Gelder, T. (1999) Heads I win, tails you lose: Desire's hold over reason. Quadrant, July/August. pdf van Gelder, T. J. (1999) Defending the dynamical hypothesis. In W. Tschacher & J.-P. Dauwalder ed., Dynamics, Synergetics, Autonomous Agents: Nonlinear Systems Approaches to Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Science. Singapore: World Scientific, 13-28. pdf van Gelder, T. J. (1998) Review of Andy Clark, Being here: Putting Mind, Body and World Back Together. Philosophical Review, 107, 647-50. html van Gelder, T. J. (1998) The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 1-14. pdf Italian translation van Gelder, T. J. (1998) Disentangling dynamics, computation, and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 40-7. pdf van Gelder, T. J. (1998) Monism, dualism, pluralism. Mind and Language, 13, 76-97. pdf van Gelder, T. J. (1998) The roles of philosophy in cognitive science. Philosophical Psychology, 11, 117-136. pdf van Gelder, T. J. (1998) Cognitive architecture: What choice do we have? In Z. Pylyshyn ed., Constraining Cognitive Theories: Issues and Options. Stamford CT: Ablex, 191-204. van Gelder, T. J. (1998) Into the Deep Blue yonder. Quadrant, 42, 33-39. html van Gelder, T. J. (1998) Computers and computation in cognitive science. In M. T. Michalewicz ed., Advances in Computational Life Sciences Vol.2: Humans to Proteins. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing, 109-126. pdf 1997Review Symposium on Mind as Motion. Metascience, New Series Issue 11, 1997, 134-40. html van Gelder, T. (1997) Connectionism, dynamics, and the philosophy of mind. In M. Carrier & P. K. Machamer ed., Mindscapes: Philosophy, Science, and the Mind. Konstanz: UVK Universitätsverlag Konstanz, 245-69. 1996Greco-Cartesian Epistemology. Bulpadok, 1996 Connectionism; Internalism - entries in T. Mautner, ed., Dictionary of Philosophy. Blackwell, 1996 van Gelder, T. J. (1996) Wooden iron? Husserlian phenomenology meets cognitive science. Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy. Online Beyond the Mind-Body Problem. html Port, R., & van Gelder, T. J. (1995) Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. MIT Press site
van Gelder, T. J., & Port, R. (1995) It's About Time: An Overview of the Dynamical Approach to Cognition. In R. Port & T. van Gelder ed., Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1-43. van Gelder, T. J. (1996) Its about time: An overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. In H. Geirsson & M. Losonsky ed., Readings in Language and Mind. Cambridge MA: Blackwell, 326-353. van Gelder, T. J. (1995) What might cognition be, if not computation? Journal of Philosophy, 91, 345-381. See also: van Gelder, T. J. (1997) The dynamical alternative. In D. Johnson & C. Erneling ed., The Future of the Cognitive Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 227-244. van Gelder, T. J. (1997) Dynamics and cognition. In J. Haugeland ed., Mind Design II. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 421-50. van Gelder, T. J. (1995) The distinction between mind and cognition. In Y.-H. Houng & J.-C. Ho ed., Mind and Cognition. Taipei: Academia Sinica, 57-82. html van Gelder, T. (1995) Modeling, Connectionist and Otherwise. In L. F. Niklasson & M. B. Bodén ed., Current Trends in Connectionism: Proceedings of the 1995 Swedish Conference on Connectionism. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 217-235. 1994van Gelder, T. J. (1994) Compositionality and dynamics in neural network representations. Sémiotiques, 6, 49-67. van Gelder, T. J., & Niklasson, L. (1994) On being systematically connectionist. Mind and Language, 9, 288-302. pdf van Gelder, T. J., & Port, R. (1994) Beyond symbolic: Towards a Kama-Sutra of compositionality. In V. Honavar & L. Uhr ed., Symbol Processing and Connectionist Network Models in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Modelling: Steps Toward Principled Integration. San Diego: Academic Press, 107-25. Niklasson, L., & van Gelder, T. (1994) Can Connectionist Models Exhibit Non-Classical Structure Sensitivity? In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pdf van Gelder, T., & Niklasson, L. (1994) Classicalism and cognitive architecture. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum, pdf van Gelder, T.J. Playing Flourens to Fodor's Gall: Commentary on Farah, Neuropsychological Inference with an Interactive Brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1994, 17: 84. 1993 Connectionism and the Mind-Body Problem: Exposing The Distinction Between Mind and Cognition.
Is Cognition Categorization? Not the Mind's New Science? Pumping Intuitions with Watt's Engine.
1992 Defining "Distributed Representation". Making Conceptual Space. "The Proper Treatment of Cognition."
1991 Classical Questions, Radical Answers: Connectionism and the Structure of Mental Representations. What is the 'D' in 'PDP'? An Overview of the Concept of Distribution. Representing Aspects of Language. Connectionism and Dynamical Explanation. Review of Paul Churchland, A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science.
1990 Compositionality: A Connectionist Variation on a Classical Theme. Why Distributed Representation is Inherently Non-Symbolic. Connectionism and Language Processing. Connectionist Models Learn What? Commentary on Hanson & Burr, What Connectionist Models Learn. Backpropagating One's Way to Aboutness.
1989 Credible Threats and Usable Weapons: Some Dilemmas of Deterrence. Compositionality and the Explanation of Cognitive Processes.
|
|
This page, its contents and style, are the responsibility of the author and do
not represent the views, policies or opinions of The University of Melbourne.
|